How Can Personal Taste Be Balanced With Objective Analysis in Reviews?


    How Can Personal Taste Be Balanced With Objective Analysis in Reviews?

    Navigating the nuanced terrain between subjective preference and critical objectivity, a Director and Founder shares insights on expanding personal literary tastes to enrich reviews. We've gathered additional answers that delve into the art of literary criticism. From employing systematic critique frameworks to fostering critical thinking skills, this article presents a spectrum of strategies for achieving balanced literary analysis.

    • Expand Personal Literary Tastes
    • Utilize Systematic Critique Frameworks
    • Update Review Criteria Regularly
    • Apply Various Theoretical Perspectives
    • Engage in Peer Review Collaborations
    • Enact Critical Thinking Skills

    Expand Personal Literary Tastes

    The subjective, the favorite, and the chosen will always creep into objective analysis, so the only real way to balance personal taste with objective analysis is to widen one's own personal tastes. This means reading outside of the comfortable, the normal, and moving on and into new eras and styles. If reading new authors and subjects is too challenging initially, read around them, watch documentaries, and listen to lectures instead. Keep an eye on your own avoidance strategies that are keeping you locked into your own comfortable field.

    Luke Shipman
    Luke ShipmanDirector and Founder, The London Ghostwriting Company

    Utilize Systematic Critique Frameworks

    A balance between personal taste and objective analysis can be achieved by utilizing systematic critique frameworks. These frameworks help in setting clear benchmarks against which various works of literature can be evaluated, allowing for consistent and fair analysis. Aspects such as themes, characterization, and language use can all be assessed separately from the reviewer's personal preferences.

    This ensures that the evaluation is based on an agreed-upon set of standards rather than individual biases. Professors should then articulate their findings in an organized manner, inviting readers to explore literature through a balanced lens.

    Update Review Criteria Regularly

    To maintain objectivity in reviews, make a habit of frequently updating review criteria. This means keeping abreast with the evolving norms and expectations of both the academic community and the larger reading audience. Adjusting criteria to reflect new insights or societal changes prevents the stagnation of analysis methods and combats the influence of personal bias.

    This act of regular revision not only improves the quality of analysis but also signifies a commitment to dynamic and fair assessment. Those interested in literary criticism should consider adopting such a practice to enrich their own review processes.

    Apply Various Theoretical Perspectives

    Considering a variety of theoretical perspectives is essential when balancing personal taste against objective analysis. This approach allows them to view a literary piece from multiple angles and understand it in the context of different literary movements and critical theories. By applying feminist, Marxist, post-colonial, and other lenses, a professor can offer a rich, multifaceted critique.

    Such a broad approach minimizes the impact of personal preferences, as it grounds evaluation on established scholarly approaches. Readers are encouraged to delve into these perspectives themselves to gain a deeper appreciation for literature.

    Engage in Peer Review Collaborations

    Encouraging peer review collaborations is another way to balance personal viewpoints with scholarly critique. By engaging with colleagues in discussions and sharing insights, professors can challenge their initial impressions and consider alternative interpretations. Collaborative reviews bring to light various angles and insights that one might overlook if working in isolation.

    This practice not only refines analysis but also demonstrates the value of interpersonal exchange. It's beneficial for readers to seek out such collaborative critiques to gain a well-rounded understanding of literary works.

    Enact Critical Thinking Skills

    Enacting critical thinking skills as a way of demonstrating how to separate personal taste from objective critique. This will instill the ability to question and analyze literature without relying solely on personal preferences. This skill aids them in recognizing the elegance of structure, the nuances of language, and the significance of context.

    Critical thinking equips people with the necessary tools to approach literature with an open mind. Future critics and literature enthusiasts are recommended to refine their critical thinking to enhance their analysis.